Raportare Avertizori vs whistly

Side-by-side facts for Raportare Avertizori and whistly, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.

At a glance

Raportare Avertizori

Romanian self-serve whistleblowing channel operated by the law firm Avocati CHIRIC & CHIRIC, built around Law 361/2022 and EU Directive 2019/1937.

Headquarters: Bucharest, Romania
Pricing: Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.
EU data hosting: Not disclosed
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Raportare Avertizori →

whistly

Berlin-based whistleblowing channel from whistly digital GmbH, positioned for German HinSchG and supply-chain (LkSG) compliance, from EUR 59 per month regardless of headcount.

Headquarters: Berlin, Germany
Pricing: Two published packages: Essential EUR 59/month and Pro EUR 99/month, charged regardless of employee count.
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to whistly →

Full facts, side by side

Full facts, side by side: Raportare Avertizori and whistly
Attribute	Raportare Avertizori	whistly
Headquarters	Bucharest, Romania	Berlin, Germany
Ownership	Private, operated by Avocati CHIRIC & CHIRIC (Bucharest law firm, CIF RO18569360)	Private, whistly digital GmbH (District Court of Charlottenburg, Berlin, HRB 249593 B)
Customers (vendor claim)	Undisclosed	100+ to 500+ organizations (vendor claims vary by page: 100+ on the LkSG page, over 200 on the about page, 500+ on the vendor blog)
Pricing	Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.	Two published packages: Essential EUR 59/month and Pro EUR 99/month, charged regardless of employee count.
Pricing model	Mixed	Flat published rate
Procurement model	Self-serve sign-up	Self-serve sign-up
Free trial	No	✓ Yes
EU data hosting	Not disclosed The public application and its API are served from Vercel; the data-hosting region and storage country are not disclosed on the public pages reviewed.	EU (named data centre) ISO 27001 certified servers in Germany (hosting-provider certification, provider not named; vendor-stated)
EU member states referenced	1 of 27	1 of 27
EU reporting languages	Partial	Partial
Total reporting languages	1	5
AI on report content	No AI processing of report content	No AI processing of report content
Certifications	None published	None published
National laws referenced	EU Directive 2019/1937 Romania (Law 361/2022)	EU Directive 2019/1937 Germany (Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz, HinSchG) Germany (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, LkSG)
Anonymous reporting	✓	✓
Case management	✓	✓
Multi-channel intake	—	—
Public API	—	—
GDPR (vendor claim)	✓	✓
EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim)	✓	✓
Last verified	19 July 2026	19 July 2026

How Raportare Avertizori and whistly differ

whistly can host report data inside the EU, while Raportare Avertizori does not publish an EU hosting option. Raportare Avertizori references 1 of the 27 EU member states and whistly references 1. Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification. Both offer self-serve sign-up without a mandatory sales call. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.

Raportare Avertizori vs whistly: common questions

Does Raportare Avertizori or whistly host whistleblower data in the EU?

whistly can host report data inside the EU, while Raportare Avertizori does not publish an EU hosting option.

How many EU member states do Raportare Avertizori and whistly cover?

Raportare Avertizori references 1 of the 27 EU member states and whistly references 1.

Is Raportare Avertizori or whistly ISO 27001 certified?

Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification.

How do Raportare Avertizori and whistly pricing and sign-up compare?

Raportare Avertizori is priced at Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.. whistly is priced at Two published packages: Essential EUR 59/month and Pro EUR 99/month, charged regardless of employee count.. Both offer self-serve sign-up without a mandatory sales call.

Do Raportare Avertizori or whistly use AI on whistleblower reports?

Neither processes report content with AI.

Another option in this directory

Raportare Avertizori and whistly are two of the platforms indexed here. If your shortlist is still open, one more worth comparing — with a different set of tradeoffs:

EthicsPortal

Whistleblower reporting portal hosted on Hetzner in Germany. Flat €60/month plan.

Headquarters: Poland
Pricing: €60/month, or €41.67/month billed annually (€500/year)
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: All 27
Certifications: ISO 27001
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile →

Compare this tool against other platforms in the directory.

See all alternatives to Raportare Avertizori → See all alternatives to whistly → Compare all platforms