OhlasTo vs Raportare Avertizori

Side-by-side facts for OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.

At a glance

OhlasTo

Czech internal reporting system and ethics hotline from Q-COM, running on the vendor's QML platform on domestic Czech servers, from 149 CZK/month.

Headquarters: Brno, Czech Republic
Pricing: Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to OhlasTo →

Raportare Avertizori

Romanian self-serve whistleblowing channel operated by the law firm Avocati CHIRIC & CHIRIC, built around Law 361/2022 and EU Directive 2019/1937.

Headquarters: Bucharest, Romania
Pricing: Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.
EU data hosting: Not disclosed
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Raportare Avertizori →

Full facts, side by side

Full facts, side by side: OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori
Attribute	OhlasTo	Raportare Avertizori
Headquarters	Brno, Czech Republic	Bucharest, Romania
Ownership	Private (Q-COM, spol. s r.o., Czech Republic; IČO 25538659)	Private, operated by Avocati CHIRIC & CHIRIC (Bucharest law firm, CIF RO18569360)
Pricing	Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.	Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.
Pricing model	Flat published rate	Mixed
Procurement model	Enterprise sales only	Self-serve sign-up
Free trial	No	No
EU data hosting	EU (named data centre) Domestic Czech servers on the vendor's QML platform (vendor-stated)	Not disclosed The public application and its API are served from Vercel; the data-hosting region and storage country are not disclosed on the public pages reviewed.
EU member states referenced	1 of 27	1 of 27
EU reporting languages	Partial	Partial
Total reporting languages	2	1
AI on report content	No AI processing of report content	No AI processing of report content
Certifications	None published	None published
National laws referenced	EU Directive 2019/1937 Czechia (Act No. 171/2023 Coll.)	EU Directive 2019/1937 Romania (Law 361/2022)
Anonymous reporting	✓	✓
Case management	✓	✓
Multi-channel intake	✓	—
Public API	—	—
GDPR (vendor claim)	✓	✓
EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim)	✓	✓
Last verified	19 July 2026	19 July 2026

How OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori differ

OhlasTo can host report data inside the EU, while Raportare Avertizori does not publish an EU hosting option. OhlasTo references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Raportare Avertizori references 1. Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification. Raportare Avertizori offers self-serve sign-up, whereas OhlasTo routes buyers through a demo or sales process. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.

OhlasTo vs Raportare Avertizori: common questions

Does OhlasTo or Raportare Avertizori host whistleblower data in the EU?

OhlasTo can host report data inside the EU, while Raportare Avertizori does not publish an EU hosting option.

How many EU member states do OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori cover?

OhlasTo references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Raportare Avertizori references 1.

Is OhlasTo or Raportare Avertizori ISO 27001 certified?

Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification.

How do OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori pricing and sign-up compare?

OhlasTo is priced at Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.. Raportare Avertizori is priced at Partly public. Plans are rendered by the client app from its own API and include monthly and annual billing plus a quote-based request-demo tier. The contract page cites a package price of 280 lei (RON) including VAT.. Raportare Avertizori offers self-serve sign-up, whereas OhlasTo routes buyers through a demo or sales process.

Do OhlasTo or Raportare Avertizori use AI on whistleblower reports?

Neither processes report content with AI.

Another option in this directory

OhlasTo and Raportare Avertizori are two of the platforms indexed here. If your shortlist is still open, one more worth comparing — with a different set of tradeoffs:

EthicsPortal

Whistleblower reporting portal hosted on Hetzner in Germany. Flat €60/month plan.

Headquarters: Poland
Pricing: €60/month, or €41.67/month billed annually (€500/year)
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: All 27
Certifications: ISO 27001
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile →

Compare this tool against other platforms in the directory.

See all alternatives to OhlasTo → See all alternatives to Raportare Avertizori → Compare all platforms