LegalTegrity vs Tissla

Q: Does LegalTegrity or Tissla host whistleblower data in the EU?

LegalTegrity can host report data inside the EU, while Tissla does not publish an EU hosting option.

Q: How many EU member states do LegalTegrity and Tissla cover?

LegalTegrity references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Tissla references 1.

Q: Is LegalTegrity or Tissla ISO 27001 certified?

LegalTegrity lists ISO 27001 certification; Tissla does not.

Q: How do LegalTegrity and Tissla pricing and sign-up compare?

LegalTegrity is priced at Annual billing: Essential €588/year (€49/mo) for <50 employees; Professional 250 €1,188/year (€99/mo) for <250; Professional 1,000 €1,990/year (€165.83/mo) for <1,000; Enterprise on request for 1,000+.. Tissla is priced at Bas from 8,000 kr/year; Premium from 13,900 kr/year; Enterprise from quote. Currently no implementation fee on any tier.. LegalTegrity offers self-serve sign-up, whereas Tissla routes buyers through a demo or sales process.

Q: Do LegalTegrity or Tissla use AI on whistleblower reports?

Neither processes report content with AI.

Side-by-side facts for LegalTegrity and Tissla, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.

At a glance

LegalTegrity

German SME whistleblowing platform. Tiered pricing €49–€165.83/month by employee count.

Headquarters: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Pricing: Annual billing: Essential €588/year (€49/mo) for <50 employees; Professional 250 €1,188/year (€99/mo) for <250; Professional 1,000 €1,990/year (€165.83/mo) for <1,000; Enterprise on request for 1,000+.
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: ISO 27001
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to LegalTegrity →

Tissla

Swedish whistleblowing SaaS from Tissla AB with published annual pricing from 8,000 kr and an optional tier where Tissla handles your cases.

Headquarters: Sundbyberg, Sweden
Pricing: Bas from 8,000 kr/year; Premium from 13,900 kr/year; Enterprise from quote. Currently no implementation fee on any tier.
EU data hosting: Not disclosed
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Tissla →

Full facts, side by side

Full facts, side by side: LegalTegrity and Tissla
Attribute	LegalTegrity	Tissla
Headquarters	Frankfurt am Main, Germany	Sundbyberg, Sweden
Ownership	Private — founded by Dr. Thomas Altenbach	Private, Tissla AB (Swedish org. no. 559450-3970)
Pricing	Annual billing: Essential €588/year (€49/mo) for <50 employees; Professional 250 €1,188/year (€99/mo) for <250; Professional 1,000 €1,990/year (€165.83/mo) for <1,000; Enterprise on request for 1,000+.	Bas from 8,000 kr/year; Premium from 13,900 kr/year; Enterprise from quote. Currently no implementation fee on any tier.
Pricing model	Tiered (per employee)	Tiered (per employee)
Procurement model	Self-serve sign-up	Demo required
Free trial	No	No
EU data hosting	EU (named data centre) Deutsche Telekom Open Telekom Cloud, Germany	Not disclosed
EU member states referenced	1 of 27	1 of 27
EU reporting languages	2 of 24	Undisclosed
Total reporting languages	40	Undisclosed
AI on report content	No AI processing of report content	No AI processing of report content
Certifications	ISO 27001 (Open Telekom Cloud hosting)	None published
National laws referenced	Germany (HinSchG)	EU Directive 2019/1937
Anonymous reporting	✓	✓
Case management	✓	✓
Multi-channel intake	✓	—
Public API	—	—
GDPR (vendor claim)	✓	✓
EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim)	✓	✓
Last verified	24 May 2026	19 July 2026

How LegalTegrity and Tissla differ

LegalTegrity can host report data inside the EU, while Tissla does not publish an EU hosting option. LegalTegrity references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Tissla references 1. LegalTegrity lists ISO 27001 certification; Tissla does not. LegalTegrity offers self-serve sign-up, whereas Tissla routes buyers through a demo or sales process. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.