Lantero vs OhlasTo
Side-by-side facts for Lantero and OhlasTo, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.
At a glance
Lantero
Swedish whistleblowing channel and case handling from Lantero AB, offered since 2014 with optional independent-lawyer case assessment and a dedicated French entity.
- Headquarters
- Stockholm, Sweden
- Pricing
- Not published. Sold by tender and by license subscription; buyers request a quote.
- EU data hosting
- EU (named data centre)
- EU member states referenced
- 2 of 27
- Certifications
- None published
- AI on report content
- No AI processing of report content
OhlasTo
Czech internal reporting system and ethics hotline from Q-COM, running on the vendor's QML platform on domestic Czech servers, from 149 CZK/month.
- Headquarters
- Brno, Czech Republic
- Pricing
- Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.
- EU data hosting
- EU (named data centre)
- EU member states referenced
- 1 of 27
- Certifications
- None published
- AI on report content
- No AI processing of report content
Full facts, side by side
| Attribute | Lantero | OhlasTo |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Brno, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2014 | Undisclosed |
| Ownership | Private - Lantero AB (Sweden), held by three Swedish shareholders | Private (Q-COM, spol. s r.o., Czech Republic; IČO 25538659) |
| Pricing | Not published. Sold by tender and by license subscription; buyers request a quote. | Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users. |
| Pricing model | Quote only | Flat published rate |
| Procurement model | Enterprise sales only | Enterprise sales only |
| Free trial | No | No |
| EU data hosting | EU (named data centre) GleSYS data centres in Falkenberg and Stockholm, Sweden (vendor-stated) | EU (named data centre) Domestic Czech servers on the vendor's QML platform (vendor-stated) |
| EU member states referenced | 2 of 27 | 1 of 27 |
| EU reporting languages | Partial | Partial |
| Total reporting languages | 4 | 2 |
| AI on report content | No AI processing of report content | No AI processing of report content |
| Certifications | None published | None published |
| National laws referenced |
|
|
| Anonymous reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Case management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-channel intake | — | ✓ |
| Public API | — | — |
| GDPR (vendor claim) | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Last verified |
How Lantero and OhlasTo differ
Both Lantero and OhlasTo can host whistleblower report data inside the EU. Lantero references 2 of the 27 EU member states and OhlasTo references 1. Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification. Both route buyers through a demo or sales process rather than self-serve sign-up. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.
Lantero vs OhlasTo: common questions
Does Lantero or OhlasTo host whistleblower data in the EU?
How many EU member states do Lantero and OhlasTo cover?
Is Lantero or OhlasTo ISO 27001 certified?
How do Lantero and OhlasTo pricing and sign-up compare?
Do Lantero or OhlasTo use AI on whistleblower reports?
Another option in this directory
Lantero and OhlasTo are two of the platforms indexed here. If your shortlist is still open, one more worth comparing — with a different set of tradeoffs:
EthicsPortal
Whistleblower reporting portal hosted on Hetzner in Germany. Flat €60/month plan.
- Headquarters
- Poland
- Pricing
- €60/month, or €41.67/month billed annually (€500/year)
- EU data hosting
- EU (named data centre)
- EU member states referenced
- All 27
- Certifications
- ISO 27001
- AI on report content
- No AI processing of report content
Related comparisons
Compare this tool against other platforms in the directory.