Alertcys vs Zateo

Q: Does Alertcys or Zateo host whistleblower data in the EU?

Both Alertcys and Zateo can host whistleblower report data inside the EU.

Q: How many EU member states do Alertcys and Zateo cover?

Alertcys references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Zateo references 1.

Q: Is Alertcys or Zateo ISO 27001 certified?

Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification.

Q: How do Alertcys and Zateo pricing and sign-up compare?

Alertcys is priced at Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).. Zateo is priced at Compliance Basic EUR 79/month, Compliance Pro EUR 119/month, Compliance Ultimate from EUR 399/month; all quoted monthly but billed annually, plus German VAT (zzgl. MwSt.).. Zateo offers self-serve sign-up, whereas Alertcys routes buyers through a demo or sales process.

Q: Do Alertcys or Zateo use AI on whistleblower reports?

Neither processes report content with AI.

Side-by-side facts for Alertcys and Zateo, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.

At a glance

Alertcys

French whistleblowing and psychosocial-risk platform with published annual pricing and optional outsourced mediation.

Headquarters: France
Pricing: Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Alertcys →

Zateo

German whistleblowing SaaS from Selfox UG with published tiers from EUR 79/month, anonymous reporting, and Germany-based hosting on an ISO/IEC 27001-certified provider.

Headquarters: Wietzen, Germany
Pricing: Compliance Basic EUR 79/month, Compliance Pro EUR 119/month, Compliance Ultimate from EUR 399/month; all quoted monthly but billed annually, plus German VAT (zzgl. MwSt.).
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Zateo →

Full facts, side by side

Full facts, side by side: Alertcys and Zateo
Attribute	Alertcys	Zateo
Headquarters	France	Wietzen, Germany
Ownership	Private	Private - Selfox UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Wietzen, Germany (Amtsgericht Walsrode HRB 207827)
Customers (vendor claim)	250+ clients (vendor claim on offer page)	Undisclosed
Pricing	Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).	Compliance Basic EUR 79/month, Compliance Pro EUR 119/month, Compliance Ultimate from EUR 399/month; all quoted monthly but billed annually, plus German VAT (zzgl. MwSt.).
Pricing model	Flat published rate	Tiered (per employee)
Procurement model	Demo required	Self-serve sign-up
Free trial	No	✓ Yes
EU data hosting	EU (named data centre)	EU (named data centre) Germany-based hosting on an ISO/IEC 27001-certified provider (Hetzner, vendor-stated)
EU member states referenced	1 of 27	1 of 27
EU reporting languages	Partial	Undisclosed
Total reporting languages	1	Undisclosed
AI on report content	No AI processing of report content	No AI processing of report content
Certifications	None published	None published
National laws referenced	France (Loi Waserman / Sapin II) EU Directive 2019/1937	EU Directive 2019/1937 Germany (HinSchG)
Anonymous reporting	✓	✓
Case management	✓	✓
Multi-channel intake	✓	—
Public API	—	—
GDPR (vendor claim)	✓	✓
EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim)	✓	✓
Last verified	24 May 2026	19 July 2026

How Alertcys and Zateo differ

Both Alertcys and Zateo can host whistleblower report data inside the EU. Alertcys references 1 of the 27 EU member states and Zateo references 1. Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification. Zateo offers self-serve sign-up, whereas Alertcys routes buyers through a demo or sales process. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.