Alertcys vs OhlasTo

Q: Does Alertcys or OhlasTo host whistleblower data in the EU?

Both Alertcys and OhlasTo can host whistleblower report data inside the EU.

Q: How many EU member states do Alertcys and OhlasTo cover?

Alertcys references 1 of the 27 EU member states and OhlasTo references 1.

Q: Is Alertcys or OhlasTo ISO 27001 certified?

Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification.

Q: How do Alertcys and OhlasTo pricing and sign-up compare?

Alertcys is priced at Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).. OhlasTo is priced at Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.. Both route buyers through a demo or sales process rather than self-serve sign-up.

Q: Do Alertcys or OhlasTo use AI on whistleblower reports?

Neither processes report content with AI.

Side-by-side facts for Alertcys and OhlasTo, sourced from vendor-published materials. Both platforms market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance.

At a glance

Alertcys

French whistleblowing and psychosocial-risk platform with published annual pricing and optional outsourced mediation.

Headquarters: France
Pricing: Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to Alertcys →

OhlasTo

Czech internal reporting system and ethics hotline from Q-COM, running on the vendor's QML platform on domestic Czech servers, from 149 CZK/month.

Headquarters: Brno, Czech Republic
Pricing: Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.
EU data hosting: EU (named data centre)
EU member states referenced: 1 of 27
Certifications: None published
AI on report content: No AI processing of report content

View full profile → See all alternatives to OhlasTo →

Full facts, side by side

Full facts, side by side: Alertcys and OhlasTo
Attribute	Alertcys	OhlasTo
Headquarters	France	Brno, Czech Republic
Ownership	Private	Private (Q-COM, spol. s r.o., Czech Republic; IČO 25538659)
Customers (vendor claim)	250+ clients (vendor claim on offer page)	Undisclosed
Pricing	Published annual pricing: Essentiel €300/year (<50 FTE), Standard €1,500/year (50+ FTE, 3 referents), Pro €4,600/year (unlimited referents).	Free for schools, kindergartens, and nonprofits (max 5 users); 149 CZK/month (excl. VAT) for companies and other organizations with unlimited users; free custom-SLA tier for existing QML information-system users.
Pricing model	Flat published rate	Flat published rate
Procurement model	Demo required	Enterprise sales only
Free trial	No	No
EU data hosting	EU (named data centre)	EU (named data centre) Domestic Czech servers on the vendor's QML platform (vendor-stated)
EU member states referenced	1 of 27	1 of 27
EU reporting languages	Partial	Partial
Total reporting languages	1	2
AI on report content	No AI processing of report content	No AI processing of report content
Certifications	None published	None published
National laws referenced	France (Loi Waserman / Sapin II) EU Directive 2019/1937	EU Directive 2019/1937 Czechia (Act No. 171/2023 Coll.)
Anonymous reporting	✓	✓
Case management	✓	✓
Multi-channel intake	✓	✓
Public API	—	—
GDPR (vendor claim)	✓	✓
EU Directive 2019/1937 (vendor claim)	✓	✓
Last verified	24 May 2026	19 July 2026

How Alertcys and OhlasTo differ

Both Alertcys and OhlasTo can host whistleblower report data inside the EU. Alertcys references 1 of the 27 EU member states and OhlasTo references 1. Neither lists an ISO 27001 certification. Both route buyers through a demo or sales process rather than self-serve sign-up. Neither processes report content with AI. Both market themselves for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance, so the better fit depends on your priorities around data residency, certification, pricing transparency, and use of AI.